Bring a process. See what it is carrying.

How obligations apply, where data risks emerge, and what controls are required — visible across your process.

Analysing · Regulatory Reporting
Step 3 · Compile Submission Data
3obligations
3risks
1control gap

Use what you already have.

Whatever you have today is enough to start.

A process diagram, SOP, report, or written description. Upload it, type it, or talk it through. Juxtabyte works with the governance framework you already have. If it is complete, it uses it. If it is partial, it fills the gaps. If none exists, it provides one so the assessment can proceed.

Juxtabyte AI does the analysis. You see the risks step by step.

Take a regulatory reporting process. At the step where data from multiple sources is compiled for submission, you see the integrity risks, the obligations triggered, and the controls required — together, at each step.

Step 3 · Compile Submission Data

Obligations

Privacy Act applies
Retention rules active
CPS 230 relevant

Risks

Data integrity risk
Privacy exposure
Quality degradation

Controls

Validation required
Access control needed
Encryption in transit

What used to take weeks to piece together can now be understood in minutes.

Ask the agent. Get a straight answer.

Every finding can be challenged. Ask why a risk was flagged, what an obligation means in context, or whether an existing control is sufficient.

The agent's answers are grounded in your organisational knowledge and guided by your framework. Each answer is specific to your process and the issue under review.

Make decisions you can explain, defend, and act on.

Step 3 · Agent Conversation

U

Why is there a privacy risk here?

J

The compilation step merges customer identity data from three source systems. Under the Privacy Act, this creates a secondary use of personal information that requires a purpose limitation control. No such control is currently mapped to this step.

Act on what you find.

When Juxtabyte identifies a risk or control gap, it creates a remediation action with a direct link to the issue it addresses. You see who owns it and where it stands.

Teams can manage remediation in Juxtabyte or in their existing workflow tools. Ownership and traceability remain clear, wherever remediation is managed.

A control gap without a remediation path is a known risk accepted by default.

Step 3 · Open Remediation

Add purpose limitation control

Linked to: Privacy exposure at Compile Submission Data

Owner
Data Governance
Status
Open
Source
Reg Reporting Process

Build an organisation-wide view of risk, one process at a time.

You can see where risk is accumulating across the organisation, where controls are consistently holding, and where remediation is still unresolved.

As processes, obligations, and policies change, you see the risk position change with them. In minutes, the view updates to reflect the organisation as it is now, so what goes to the board, the regulator, or the risk committee is current, not stitched together after the fact.

A current view of risk. Not a quarterly reconstruction.

Organisation Risk Position

Customer Onboarding

Risks identified7
Controls mapped5
Open remediation2

Regulatory Reporting

Risks identified12
Controls mapped8
Open remediation4

Lending Process

Risks identified9
Controls mapped9
Open remediation0

Built by the team behind the data governance framework APRA rated highest among Tier 1 financial institutions.

Bring a process.
Whatever you have today is enough to start.