Bring a process. See what it is carrying.
See how obligations apply, where data risks emerge, and what controls are required across your process.
Use what you already have.
A process diagram, SOP, report, or written description. Upload it, type it, or talk it through. Whatever you have today is enough to start.
Juxtabyte works with the governance framework you already have. If it is complete, it uses it. If it is partial, it fills the gaps. If none exists, it provides one so the assessment can proceed.
Juxtabyte AI does the analysis. You see the risks step by step.
Take a regulatory reporting process. At the step where data from multiple sources is compiled for submission, you see the integrity risks that apply, the obligations triggered by the data involved, and the controls required to manage those risks.
Regulatory Reporting · Step 3 of 5
Compile Submission Data
Obligations
- Privacy Act applies
- Retention rules active
- CPS 230 relevant
Risks
- Data integrity risk
- Privacy exposure
- Quality degradation
Controls
- Validation required
- Access control needed
- Encryption in transit
Instead of reviewing privacy, data quality, integrity, retention, and security separately, you see them together at each step of the process.
What used to take weeks to piece together can now be understood in minutes.
Ask the agent. Get a straight answer.
Every finding can be challenged. Ask why a risk was flagged at a specific step, what an obligation means in the context of your process, or whether an existing control matches what is required.
The agent’s answers are grounded in your organisational knowledge and guided by your framework and taxonomies where available. Each answer is specific to your process and the issue under review.
Compile Submission Data · Step 3 of 5
Why this risk applies.
Make decisions you can explain, defend, and act on.
Act on what you find.
When Juxtabyte identifies a risk or control gap, it creates a remediation action with a direct link to the issue it addresses. You see who owns it and where it stands.
Teams can manage remediation in Juxtabyte or in their existing workflow tools. Ownership and traceability remain clear, wherever remediation is managed.
Compile Submission Data · Step 3 of 5
Add purpose limitation control.
- Owner
- Data Governance
- Status
- Open
- Source
- Reg Reporting Process
A control gap without a remediation path is a known risk accepted by default.
Build an organisation-wide view of risk, one process at a time.
You can see where risk is accumulating across the organisation, where controls are consistently holding, and where remediation is still unresolved.
As processes, obligations, and policies change, you see the risk position change with them. In minutes, the view updates to reflect the organisation as it is now, so what goes to the board, the regulator, or the risk committee is current, not stitched together after the fact.
A current view of risk. Not a quarterly reconstruction.
Built by the team behind the data governance framework APRA rated highest among Tier 1 financial institutions.